RCC Honors Program
 

RCC Library

 
 
 
 
 

















































Outcomes Matrix for HUM320: Honors Colloquium


Outcomes
Activities Assessment
· Understand better how the world works by looking through various lenses provided by different writers and speakers · Read multiple viewpoints on various problems of human rights
· Listen to guest speakers and instructors who take different points of view
· Write summaries and responses to readings.
· Write responses to speakers; post on a blog
· Participation in study group
· Have a skeptical academic attitude
· Have sharpened critical thinking skills
· Critiques of various sources by instructors
· Evaluate written sources and websites
· Critique a source
· Evaluate websites
· Be able to integrate various sources into a single research project with an original controlling thesis · Carry out the steps in the research paper assignment: approved topic; working bibliography; reading sources; thesis and outline; rough draft; final draft
· Meet with mentor
· Hand in each step of the project for comments and evaluation
· Completed research project
· Have developed an awareness and appreciation of human rights
· Be able to articulate main problems and controversial issues in regard to human rights
· Class discussion of reading
· Class discussion with invited speakers on human rights activities
· Participation in study group on readings
· Informal papers and writing activities· Research paper
· Participation in discussions
· Participation on blog
· Essay tests
· PowerPoint Presentation
· Poster presentation

The following additional competencies are required for Composition 1 – Honors

Outcomes for research assignment
Activities Assessment
Integrate college-level writing into a documented essay of 5 – 7 pages, using sources assigned by the instructor · Evaluation of arguments using a standard that analyzes pitfalls, inductive reasoning, and deductive reasoning
· Peer evaluations
· Presentation to class and Honors Program committee
· Grading of final draft of research paper using specific rubrics
· Grading of presentation
· Peer and instructor evaluation on clarity, content, effectiveness
Read and integrate information from a cluster of college-level sources on an assigned topic · Debate on assigned readings
· “Thought” journals on assigned readings
· Grading of debate participation by peers and instructor on effectiveness, preparation and persuasiveness
· Evaluation of journal entries on accurate interpretation, separation of summary and response